CM ClearMarket
SYSTEM: LIVE · PRICES: HOURLY REFRESH · COVERAGE: ~3,860 EVENTS / ~39,200 MARKETS · KALSHI + POLYMARKET

TX-15 House winner? [ resolves 2027-01-04 (153D) ]

kalshi: [A] single source·objective outcome methodology ›
distribution · by outcome · marks: daily snapshot
kalshi 2 markets
market resolves P(YES) vol (24h) vol (cum) RCG venue id
Democratic 2027-01-04 67.0%
$1.3K $46K
A HOUSETX15-26-D
Republican 2027-01-04 41.0%
$1.1K $7.5K
A HOUSETX15-26-R
resolution architecture
venue proposer source citation arbitration class analyst notes
kalshi Exchange Staff Library of Congress not provided Kalshi Staff Other
verbatim rules
kalshi 2 markets · share this text
If the House member sworn in for TX-15 for the term beginning in 2027 is a member of the Democratic Party, then the market resolves to Yes.
platform source field kalshi.settlement_sources → "Library of Congress"
sources (1) · single authority
Library of Congress committed source
recent wire items
  • 2026-08-14T09:04:43+00:00 volume-spike
    TX-15 House race tightens with GOP at 40% 40% · $88K 24h
    • 40% puts Republicans as underdogs in TX-15, a notable framing for a Texas seat.
    • $88K in 24h represents 31% of all-time volume, a sharp single-session burst.
    • Competitive House map attention; TX-15 pricing suggests district-level vulnerability.
    • Resolves on November 2026 general election result.
  • 2026-08-13T09:08:38+00:00 volume-spike
    TX-15 House seat draws buyers below 50% on the Dem side 45% · $83K 24h
    • Kalshi prices a Democratic TX-15 House win at 45%, Republicans hold a slim implied edge.
    • 47% of all-time contract volume hit in a single session, the largest single-day share of this batch.
    • A near-even price with surging volume signals late-entry attention to a district shifting competitive.
    • Resolves on the TX-15 2026 House general election result.
  • 2026-08-12T09:08:32+00:00 volume-spike
    Democrats hold a slim edge in the TX-15 House race 62% · $85K 24h
    • Kalshi prices a Democratic win in TX-15 at 62%, a narrow lean in a competitive district.
    • $85K in 24h is 66% of all-time volume, indicating this market is relatively thin but actively accumulating.
    • TX-15 sits in the Rio Grande Valley; fresh attention here often precedes candidate or polling news.
    • Resolves on the certified winner of the 2026 TX-15 House general election.
  • 2026-07-29T10:36:04+00:00 volume-spike
    Democrats lead in TX-15 House race with odds above 50% 58% · $24K 24h
    • Kalshi prices a Democratic win in Texas's 15th congressional district at 58%, a narrow lean.
    • 63% of all-time volume arrived in 24h, compressing the contract's trading history into one session.
    • TX-15 is a competitive Rio Grande Valley seat; fresh polling or candidate news likely drove the inflow.
    • Resolves on the official TX-15 election result; race remains inside the margin of conviction.
programmatic access · four surfaces, same payload

One canonical record at every surface — embedded JSON-LD, REST, MCP, and /llms.txt.

HTMLbrowsers, AI grounded search, crawlers (embedded JSON-LD @type: Dataset)https://clearmarket.fyi/events/housetx15-26/
JSONREST API for developershttps://api.clearmarket.fyi/v1/events/housetx15-26
MCPagentic AI tool call (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue)clearmarket.get_event("housetx15-26")
AGENTAI crawler discovery index/llms.txt

Snapshot 2026-08-04. Venue data via Kalshi + Polymarket APIs. Editorial fields (tags, editorial_notes) are ClearMarket-drafted with AI assistance under editorial review. Derived fields (venues_covered, resolution_clarity_grade, rcg_score) computed at serve time. Full per-field map in the JSON record under field_provenance.

raw JSON record · same payload returned by REST endpoint
{
  "event_id": "CM-EVT-F1CD0HM6W4",
  "slug": "housetx15-26",
  "question": "TX-15 House winner?",
  "category": "politics",
  "tags": [
    "politics",
    "texas-politics",
    "house-elections",
    "2027-elections",
    "us-congress",
    "electoral-outcomes"
  ],
  "venues_covered": [
    "kalshi"
  ],
  "market_count": 2,
  "cumulative_volume_usd": 53077,
  "resolution_clarity_grade": "A",
  "rcg_score": 90,
  "rcg_caps": [],
  "resolution_source": "Library of Congress",
  "resolution_source_url": "https://www.congress.gov/",
  "source_status": "platform_named",
  "source_of_record": "Library of Congress",
  "resolution_source_list": [
    {
      "name": "Library of Congress",
      "url": "https://www.congress.gov/",
      "provenance": "platform_api"
    }
  ],
  "arbitration_model": "kalshi_staff",
  "proposer_model": "platform_staff",
  "field_provenance": {
    "question": {
      "source": "clearmarket_editorial"
    },
    "tags": {
      "source": "clearmarket_editorial",
      "ai_drafted": true
    },
    "resolution_clarity_grade": {
      "source": "derived",
      "method": "rcg_v2_7factor"
    },
    "venues_covered": {
      "source": "derived"
    }
  }
}
snapshot 2026-08-04T20:03:51.865287+00:00 schema v0.2.0-universe all events →