Will the altcoin market cap dip to $150B before 2027? [ resolves 2027-01-01 (162D) ]
Altcoin market cap dip to $150B before 2027?
polymarket: [C] single source·objective outcome methodology ›
markets · by resolution date · marks: daily snapshot
polymarket 1 market
| market | resolves | P(YES) | vol (24h) | vol (cum) | RCG | venue id | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 150,000,000,000% | 2027-01-01 | 60.0% | — | $274K | C | 0x21499b…e193 |
resolution architecture
| venue | proposer | source | citation | arbitration | class | analyst notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| polymarket | Whitelisted Proposers | not provided | link | Optimistic Oracle (UMA) | Other | — |
verbatim rules
polymarket
This market will resolve to “Yes” if any TradingView 1 minute candle for CRYPTOCAP:OTHERS between November 3, 2025, 11:00 AM ET and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET has a final “Low” price equal to or lower than the price specified in the title. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
The resolution source for this market is TradingView, specifically the CRYPTOCAP:OTHERS “Low” prices available at https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CRYPTOCAP%3AOTHERS, with the chart settings on “1m” and “Candles” selected on the top bar.
Please note that this market depends solely on price data from the TradingView CRYPTOCAP:OTHERS chart. Prices from other sources, indices, or exchanges will not be considered for the resolution of this market.
platform source field
polymarket.description → https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CRYPTOCAP%3AOTHERS sources (3) · single authority
- tradingview.com source of record venue-listed
- TradingView from rules text · editorial
- https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CRYPTOCAP%3AOTHERS from rules text · editorial
recent wire items
monitoring status: active no active wire
No CM Signal wire has been published for this event yet.
CM Signal’s news-cycle scan surfaces the day’s top stories alongside the prediction markets pricing them. When a story references this event, its wire is published here and links back to this page.
programmatic access · four surfaces, same payload
One canonical record at every surface — embedded JSON-LD, REST, MCP, and /llms.txt.
| HTML | browsers, AI grounded search, crawlers (embedded JSON-LD @type: Dataset) | https://clearmarket.fyi/events/altcoin-market-cap-dip-to-150b-before-2027/ |
| JSON | REST API for developers | https://api.clearmarket.fyi/v1/events/altcoin-market-cap-dip-to-150b-before-2027 |
| MCP | agentic AI tool call (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue) | clearmarket.get_event("altcoin-market-cap-dip-to-150b-before-2027") |
| AGENT | AI crawler discovery index | /llms.txt |
Snapshot 2026-07-23. Venue data via Kalshi + Polymarket APIs. Editorial fields (tags, editorial_notes) are ClearMarket-drafted with AI assistance under editorial review. Derived fields (venues_covered, resolution_clarity_grade, rcg_score) computed at serve time. Full per-field map in the JSON record under field_provenance.
raw JSON record · same payload returned by REST endpoint {
"event_id": "CM-EVT-1X3VYY2NP9",
"slug": "altcoin-market-cap-dip-to-150b-before-2027",
"question": "Will the altcoin market cap dip to $150B before 2027?",
"category": "crypto",
"tags": [
"crypto",
"crypto-prices",
"altcoin-market-cap",
"price-threshold",
"2027"
],
"venues_covered": [
"polymarket"
],
"market_count": 1,
"cumulative_volume_usd": 274015,
"resolution_clarity_grade": "C",
"rcg_score": 62,
"rcg_caps": [
"commitment_committed_secondhand"
],
"resolution_source": null,
"resolution_source_url": "https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CRYPTOCAP%3AOTHERS",
"source_status": "platform_named",
"source_of_record": "tradingview.com",
"resolution_source_list": [
{
"name": "tradingview.com",
"url": "https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CRYPTOCAP%3AOTHERS",
"provenance": "platform_api"
},
{
"name": "TradingView",
"url": null,
"provenance": "clearmarket_editorial"
},
{
"name": "https://www.tradingview.com/chart/?symbol=CRYPTOCAP%3AOTHERS",
"url": null,
"provenance": "clearmarket_editorial"
}
],
"arbitration_model": "uma_oracle",
"proposer_model": "managed_whitelist",
"field_provenance": {
"question": {
"source": "clearmarket_editorial"
},
"tags": {
"source": "clearmarket_editorial",
"ai_drafted": true
},
"resolution_clarity_grade": {
"source": "derived",
"method": "rcg_v2_7factor"
},
"venues_covered": {
"source": "derived"
}
}
}